Dear Pals,
Remember the quote about Desktop Publishing from back in the late 70's? "Thanks to this new desktop publishing technology, more people will now be able to create more bad advertising faster than ever before."
Now in the age of the twit, tweet, twat, twot, IM and the text, sext message, I'm afraid we have taken personal and marketing communications to a new low and even higher level of all invasive ubiquitousness, with an accompanying loss of quality in thoughtful ideers and corekt gramur an gud spellink.
Let me axe you a few questions...
1. As you navigate through your world each day, do you ever wonder...who are all of those seemingly robotic people on cell phones talking to?
2. What is so important that it needs to be texted instantly at the speed of thumb while driving, walking or running a mass transit commuter train?
3. Are you ever astounded at who is actually attempting to walk, talk, text and chew gum at the same time?
4. Is all of this social networking communication a PLUS or MINUS - or is it a zero-sum game?
Now I'm no Ludite, I have embraced new technology to some extent and must confess that I particularly enjoy writing my daily blog. It helps keep my mind active and writing skills honed.
It also allows me to have a semi-recreational outlet where I can safely express my arguably quirky-birky Libertarian ideas in some depth without getting knocked off a barstool.
When I commited to doing a daily blog for one year, I wanted to find out about the Internet and how the blogosphere worked firsthand. I was going to let it all "hang out" - figureatively speaking - and be prepared to accept both brickbats and bouquets.
Secretly, I wondered if one ordinary fat man -- alone in his den in the heart of the Midwest, wrapped in his cozy claret-colored Snuggie, slaving over a hot keyboard in the wee hours of the morning -- could make any difference at all by contributing to the national debate and participating in the marketplace of ideas.
This also caused me to think about writers and thinkers that I admire from days of yore.
One can't help but wonder what Thoreau might have written if he had Twitter. "Pond is calm. Lots of flies. Love and Hate it here. Free the slaves."
Or, would Emerson have written even longer and more insightful essays if he had a keyboard instead of a quill?
Would Lincoln have delivered The Emancipation Proclamation via LinkedIn?
Would Churchill have simply texted, "Blood. Toil. Tears. Sweat. Kill Nazis. WC"
Would Roosevelt have posted his exhortations on Facebook instead of chatting by the fireside?
Every age has had its communication breakthroughs.
Printing.
Moveable type.
Quill
Pencil
Telegraph.
Typewriter
Radio
Fountain pen
Television
Ballpoint pen
PCs
PDAs
cellular and digital photo telephony...and who know's what'll come next?
Maybe future generations will have a Nanoprocessor chip containing all the information accumulated by mankind installed in their brains at the Born On Date. (The chip might even have an "expiration or Die On Date" in it too!)
Perhaps that's why so many depictions of aliens feature such big heads, big eyes and very small mouths. Maybe aliens evolved beyond speech because they had nothing to talk about anymore, since all the knowledge was already stored inside their brain's nanoprocessor chip and it used the brain's naturally occuring electro-magnetic synaptic pulses and thereby enabled them to "read minds" - each others...and ours too!
Now there's something to ponder...
Do you think all of this current infatuation with compulsive interpersonal communication is causing a pandemic of cultural attention deficit disorder?
For instsance, have you ever been talking to someone when their phone's ring tone starts playing Dixie, only to have them instantly divert their attention from you to the incoming call?
Are people actually addicted to cellular calling, texting, facebooking, blogging - and are we all becoming trapped in a wireless web of our own creation as we wander through the day?
Is the art of face-to-face conversation quickly dying - as electronic avoidance through message screening and the illusion of personal contact created by email and texting replaces in-the-flesh human contact?
Does all of this contribute to better thinking and interpersonal communication? Or is it just more intrusion, static and noise? Or, in some cases, is it non-reponsive silence that simulataneously desensitizes and and depresses us?
How much real productivity in business is lost?
How much needless anxiety is created?
How much anger is instantly vented and transmitted by sending a hot-under-the-collar email or text message?
How many avoidable misunderstandings are created?
And, finally...what are people really interested in?
I must confess that when I view my blog's readership stats, that I am always surprised by which blogs pop up there because people are searching the web using long trail phrases or multiple keywords.
I have had searches from Saudi Arabia, New Zealand, Australia, India, Japan and South Africa. Trackbacks have shown that some of my blogs were translated into other languages like Dutch, Italian, Spanish, German and even Canadian.
When you send out an email to your Pals, you never know who they might forward it too. Ditto on blogging, you never know where it will end up. It's surprising, interesting and sometimes just plain weird.
The old adage, "I shot an arrow into the air and where it lands I do not care, " applies to emails and blogs too!
Here's a little experiment: How many of you will click on the link below to learn about my Capstone Project? www.capstonepyramid.com
Hmmm...I wonder??
Birk, Commonsensetarian and Citizen of the Republic
PS: I hope you do check out The Capstone Project...it's near and dear to my heart.
I'm just tossing a pebble in the Internet Pond...who knows what will happen now?
